|
||||||
We're not the only ones who are outraged - here are some outside outrages that caught our eye!
|
||||||
Issue: We pay lip service to setting aside international differences and coming together in the spirit of healthy competition, good fun, and the common ground that makes us all human--but the way it plays out looks a lot like all of the other international power plays in the world.
Impact: Stronger, richer countries use the Olympics as one more means of demonstrating their superiority and lording it over the rest of the world and we all get wrapped up in the spirit of pride in "our team"--or the sinking feeling of knowing that our team isn't up to par--extending international tensions into yet another arena rather than bridging the gaps.
Read More: Promoting World Peace by Counting Everybody's Gold
Issue: Police departments in major cities across the country aren't content to arrest self-made criminals, but have decided to hit the streets and see whether they can create some more.
Impact: Time and tax dollars poured into sting operations designed to test ordinary people and create crimes that would never have been; meanwhile, who's minding the store? Hundreds of thousands of unserved felony warrants lie inactive across the country while police experiment in subways, department stores and on streetcorners.
Read More: Make Your Own Criminal – It's So Much Easier than Chasing the Real Ones
Issue: Righteous indignance and the spirit of protest sweep us away for the pettiest of reasons; hundreds of thousands of complaints pour in and a dozen attorneys work for more than four years to hash out the consequences of a half-second view of a pop star's breast.
Impact: We use up our time, energy, and money on the easy battles while the ones that could change the world languish, unfought, because they weren't as spicy or as simplistic and they required that we do more than pick up the phone or dash off an email.
Read More: Janet Jackson’s Breast Eclipses World Issues
From the author of Globally Rational

Barack Obama has been criticized for being “too vague” and not providing enough details about his plans for change in America. But are we ready to listen to the details? In a culture of buzz words, sound bites, and cheap plays for emotional reactions, would a candidate who tried to tell us what he planned to do and why stand a chance—or would we tune out the details and flock back to someone who was willing to boil it down to a catchy slogan and pretend that there were easy answers?
Read More: Election 2008 - Buzzwords and Blurred Issues