I'm referring to the idea up for vote at
change.org (a very cool site, incidentally) on forgiving student loans, the one I've installed that widget for here. The short version: please please pretty please with a catnip mouse on top consider taking a moment to
vote for this idea. The top ten ideas from change.org will be presented to Obama's administration on January 16th, and I'm really hoping both this one and the CPSIA one that I blogged about several posts ago will make the cut.
The long version, for those who are bored, or curious, includes my reasons for supporting this idea below (but since I can't help but chat on about this one in depth, I thought I'd put the most important thing--the voting--up front).
My husband and I have a huge amount of loan debt--I won't name specific numbers because it would probably bother him if I did--but most of it comes from his undergrad, when he was forced to take out a lot of loans to get his BA because his financial status was being judged based on his father's income--which was fairly high at the time--and thus he couldn't qualify for need-based funding. The problem was that his father wasn't actually paying for any of my husband's schooling, and the college he was attending was too small to have much in the way of student work programs (those it did have were reserved for those who had been judged to merit need-based aid) and too difficult, academically, to manage working and taking classes at the same time (the school only allowed full time enrollment).
Once he graduated, he became a journalist--a job he was perfectly designed for, but which unfortunately didn't pay very much (newspaper reporters never made much, even before the decline of the industry), so though he was paying his loans back he was doing so at a fairly slow rate. Then the newspaper industry started failing (it's only hitting public consciousness now, but it began around 2003) and he was laid off. He applied for newspaper jobs all over the place but could find none, and he'd been doing it for 5 years and the job skills didn't exactly translate into another career.
Since then, he's taken more part time jobs than I can name without boring everyone with the length of the list, but has had no luck in securing lasting full time employment despite trying very hard to find it. In the meantime, I've been in school, getting first my MA and now my PhD; I've been getting funding, but not enough not to need to take out a few loans of my own. Consequently, our monthly income is such that we qualify to make much smaller than normal payments on his student loans, which is very nice--except those payments are entirely interest, without any principal. Thus for most of the last 4 years we've been scraping by and paying what we can while never actually decreasing our debt owed.
This seems incredibly messed up to me. Yes, I understand that one's word is one's bond, and that if you agree to something you are responsible for fulfilling your agreement. At the same time, if you are found to be making a strong effort to uphold your end of the bargain and are unable to because of circumstances outside your realm of control (i.e. the economic mess we're all in currently), it seems morally offensive to me that the contract wouldn't be renegotiated in a way that is fair and reasonable for everyone. It's not that I think my husband and I should be let off scott-free from our debts (though that would certainly be nice, I won't lie), but that I think it does no-one any good--the government, the loan companies, nor those in debt--to be trapped in a fairly unbreakable cycle of perpetual payment without actual debt reduction.
One of the elements of the idea up for vote at change.org is the idea of forgiving the interest on student loans, and that seems reasonable to me, especially given all the loans that are being covered by the fed for various banks, etc. Yes, there is such a thing as living by a set of principles--but practicality has to factor into life as well (as we all know all too well, I'm sure), and practically speaking forcing individuals to uphold their debt responsibilities while forgiving large corporations of theirs doesn't seem like a solution, since it will require individual consumer confidence to get us out of this mess, and that confidence is pretty hard to attain when under a mountain of debt with no clear way through it.
Of course, I'm not an economist, so perhaps I'm getting this wrong. I certainly welcome discussion of the idea, regardless of whether you agree or disagree. In the meantime, I'll get off my soapbox.
And, like I said, I promise the next post will have something to do with handmade, cats, or both :)
I just found Lisa Lectura's blog today, and a giveaway she has going on until the 11th to celebrate her 100th blog post. I really like her art dolls and prints; they're tres quirky and fanciful.
This time, besides just the typical difficulty of him hating to choose amongst cute kitties (during which time he mumbles and grumbles about not knowing how he could have possibly been foolish enough to volunteer to be my "objective" judge for the photos that were sent in), he also had to contend with each of the kitties vying for a different choice.
Then Puma chimed in to say he was very impressed with Angel's (of BeadedTail fame) stocking-snagging skills, hoping that if her photo won she might be willing to give him some free lessons.
He also got into a slightly heated argument with Puma about why the ability to choose the perfect spot to sit was superior to the ability to stand on two paws, accusing Puma of acting far too "human-y" for a "proper" feline (Zorro has very definite notions about these things).
