“Above the Fold” rule officialy changed to “One Page-down” rule
Written on March 16th, 2009 by Graham
**UPDATE**
The one page-down rule will apply to screen resolutions of 1920×1200. This is the maximum screen resolution out of all Entrecard members, so there will be no one in the system who cannot place the widget within one page-down of their own personal screen and still be in violation.
Again, what this means is that no matter what your screen resolution is, you can place the widget within one page-down of your computer screen and be in compliance.
Greetings Entrecarders!
While a lot of the dust is still settling around our recent announcements, an important change has already been made.
The “Above the Fold” rule that we notified you we were implementing in a week’s time has now officially been changed to a “1 Page-down Rule.” What it means is that your widget should be placed withing one stroke of the page-down key.
It was immediately clear after our announcement that a strict “above the fold” mandate was not something that many members wanted to, or could, comply with. So, as a clear signal to you, our members, that we listen to all your feedback and incorporate as much of it as we can, we’ve gone ahead and decided on the change.
More exposure and traffic for all members
I’d like to take this opportunity to clarify for you in a succinct way exactly how this new “1 page-down” rule will effect your results with Entrecard specifically, as bloggers and entrecard advertisers.
Immediately, you should notice a decrease in your bounce rate. Whether it will be very slight or more significant is yet to be seen. However, it stands to reason that the only people clicking on low-placed entrecard widgets (which must now either be removed or moved within 1 page-down) are other Entrecard members, who may wish to drop and run.
With every widget in the network mandated to be placed high, your ads will reach the general audiences of every blog you advertise on, which should include many readers who are not Entrecard members. And we all know, if you’re not an Entrecard member, you can’t drop and run.
Thus, we anticipate a drop in the bounce rate as your ads across the board are exposed to wider audiences and run in better placements. We also anticipate that you will receive an increase from ad traffic. Although we will be taking as much as 50% of the impressions under the new system, the higher placement may generate more than 50% more clicks to make up for it. Again, this is all speculation, but we have very strong reasons to believe that the higher placement will reduce bounce rate and increase clicks, especially from non-Entrecard members.
The future of credits
Also wanted to take a quick moment to address one particularly disturbing concern. Some people seem to be under the impression that we’re doing away with our credit system. This is not true! Our credit system remains the life blood of the whole program. We’re merely providing an exchange for you to swap your credits for cash. You’ll still earn credits all the ways you currently earn credits, and you’ll still be able to spend them on advertising on any blog in the network, products and services in our shop, and giveaways for contests. This is not changing, and will never change. That is Entrecard.
March 16th, 2009 at 5:24 am
Curious as to what screen resolution the “one page down” is measured by? My resolution is 1920 by 1200, yet some people are still rocking 800 by 600…so our “one page down” are going to be a completely different amount.
March 16th, 2009 at 5:44 am
education, help support are the keys not law enforcement, pity the person who holds the tape measure even with screen resolution you also have differing screen sizes as per say. i only see a lot of unneeded work and frustration.
if the anticipations are rite then sharing the success stories will see people want to move it up on their own bat, also provide a real resource on how successful people work / do things so others may follow and learn, and in doing so create an environment of a happy team.
put the big stick away, it never works.
March 16th, 2009 at 6:06 am
wait…who has a big stick???
I think everyone is reading things in a completely different way than they should…has anyone been banned yet or removed because of the widget display that I don’t know about?
Have we not been completely compliant with your needs to keep it out of the ATF requirement?
Didn’t people beg and beg since day 1 to have Entrecard monetized? (the answer is a resounding YES)
Then give it a try…if this completely fails we will try something else and you won’t have invested any of your own money into it…still free for you!
If you will all go over to the market today im gonna be offering xanax for 10ec a piece…free shipping.
March 16th, 2009 at 6:29 am
I do understand Entrecard’s situation but it must also understand the users situation. This is a catch 22 situation, love to see the end result.
March 16th, 2009 at 6:35 am
Please don’t hit me with Entrecard’s big stick
March 16th, 2009 at 6:45 am
I had manage to delete my blog pop-up, please take a look, and get me back on the line… I had send a ticket but no reply, so I had no choice but to post it here…. thanks !
March 16th, 2009 at 7:01 am
Well, i think if everyone moves the EC card near the top of their page, they wouldnt have to worry about any silly rule.
just check out my blog, see it immediately on any res screen, without it affecting the layout or look of the site, while keeping in line with the “silly” new rules.
March 16th, 2009 at 7:01 am
Let’s do the dry run and see what happens. I know you guys out there are trying to help. Cheers.
March 16th, 2009 at 7:07 am
please gift a sample with images…
March 16th, 2009 at 7:14 am
James has an excellent point that needs to be clarified as soon as possible. The screen resolution issue has been raised quite a few times over the past few days concerning the new ‘above the fold’ or now ‘one page scroll down’ rule and I have yet to see an answer. The screen resolution this rule is based on is vital in redesigning our blogs. Can someone from Entrecard provide an answer so those of us who need to redesign our blogs to meet the new rule can in a timely fashion given we have less than a week to do so.
Thank you and I look forward to the changes.
March 16th, 2009 at 7:42 am
Nice move graham from now onwards entrecarders will also earn while being with entrecard and as you have mentioned cash for credit points more and more entrecard visitors will visit more sites and drop on them.
good job keep it up,
anisha
March 16th, 2009 at 7:46 am
Excellent. Everybody is vying for that “first-fold”, we’ll end up pushing down our own ads and navigation links to fit-in everybody :p
So with that, big kudos. Something new, a “change”.
Thank you.
March 16th, 2009 at 7:48 am
Forgot to mention one thing regarding the third-party adveritising I think it would definately help out entrecard to earn something and make it more better then ever and it should be maintained.Well as i have noticed if you visit other;s site and give a drop as your presence in their site you will definately get a drop back visit to your site.
Most of the entrecard toppers are dedicated droppers and they have mostly reverted the drop back visit .
So this move will definately increase visits to your site if you are dedicated dropper and are sincerely visiting other’s blog instead of drop and run.
Hope this clicks to everybody
March 16th, 2009 at 8:02 am
i’ve changed mine to the “upper fold” area.. i think it’s ok
March 16th, 2009 at 8:36 am
My resolution is 1152×864 and having moved the widget a couple of notches upwards, it now complies with the rule. You better like it, as I do not intend to move it any higher.
Best
March 16th, 2009 at 9:05 am
A “page down” placement? I think this requirement is still exaggerated. In my opinion each entrecarder should be allowed to place the widget wherever he sees fit. Even ad networks don’t force you to place their ad code on specific places, but give you the liberty of choosing it yourself. It’s our blogs, for crying out loud!!
March 16th, 2009 at 9:13 am
Ad placement has NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with bounce rate. Bounce rate is not limited to “Drop & Run” traffic. A viewer who reads your entire main page but doesn’t click to any of your other pages adds to your bounce rate, too. This is why blogs have higher bounce rates.
If you are going to discuss bounce rate from a position of authority, PLEASE do not print misinformation.
March 16th, 2009 at 10:01 am
“If you are going to discuss bounce rate from a position of authority, PLEASE do not print misinformation.” Was this by any chance in response to MY comment?
March 16th, 2009 at 10:06 am
This is a much less alarming explanation of the situation but I can’t be on board yet because of the confusion around advertisers. My blog is quite new and I am working on developing an audience that is loyal to me because of the writing. I don’t have any ads or widgets (except EC) and I had planned to keep it that clean for quite some time. So…as much as you say that advertisers will be high quality, I still think that I will be rejecting the great majority of advertisers. I chose to include the EC widget b/c I like this reciprocal support relationship with other bloggers. I have no problem giving my tiny spotlight to other bloggers, but do I have to start hawking products? I’m concerned that I will use up all my credits rejecting ads. Accruing credits is already extremely time-consuming, I can’t see dedicating even more time to this. And am also confused about my ability to buy ads on blogs. Am I competing with advertisers who are paying cash for the impressions? I also wonder what it will take for my blog to seem “valuable” – there were some rather dergotary remarks made about those of us “worth” a low number of credits (I’m 64ec, but I know my blog is high quality) and how the EC community won’t miss us. I really hope I have it all wrong regarding the adverts and “worth” because I do enjoy being here and I do appreciate all the work you do to create exposure for bloggers.
March 16th, 2009 at 10:06 am
AGREED… the position will have nothing to do with the bounce rate. I place my widget near the bottom of the page for the very reason that placing it at the top makes “hit and run” dropping easy and fast.
At least if they have to scroll to the bottom, they might see something in the blog content that catches their eye.
March 16th, 2009 at 10:18 am
I am intrigued by this direction for EC. I like the ability to sell credits.
The ‘above the fold’ and ‘one page-down’ issue should be resolved by something like:
“The bottom of the EC widget must appear at or above 1600 px from the top of the screen.” Change the px as needed. This gives an absolute, and thus enforceable, standard rather than the vague and relative one that was proposed and revised.
I will be surprised if I am the first to suggest this.
March 16th, 2009 at 10:33 am
Well , I have placed my widget at the top of my site sidebar and I will settle it there –it seems nicer there:) , anyway when I press page down my widget disappears but I think this will not be a reason to delete my account after all it is at the top.
See yourself http://www.host4nocost.com
March 16th, 2009 at 11:06 am
Graham,
This was explained much better on why you want the ads to be placed high on the blog. Instead of sounding like “we have some third parties coming in so you have to do your blog our way”, it instead explains how it helps us to get exposure by having it visible each time someone views the publisher’s blog.
However, that said, I still think you are trying to set a rule on something that can’t even be defined, much less enforced. I think most people would agree what is “one page down button push” will vary tremendously from system to system.
A good quality control process is great. It keeps out spammers and some others who are detrimental to the system. But telling people where widgets must be placed is taking it a bit too far. If someone doesn’t like where my widget is they can opt to not advertise on my blog. Its that simple.
I understand your intent better now, but I think its hopping right at the edge of a very slippery slope.
March 16th, 2009 at 11:16 am
I will wait to see how this plays out. In the meantime, can you let me know if the existing placement of the EC banner on my website would pass the test? I can’t move it further up.
thanks for listening and responding to your users.
March 16th, 2009 at 11:46 am
Does Entrecard even understand the math behind screen resolution? The subject keeps getting glazed over, even when asked repeatedly, poo or get off the loo…
800 x 600?
1024 x 768?
Waffle time is about up, pick a number…
This blog already has the widget removed, no one dictates “paid ads” to this blog. My other two will remain on the network for now to see how the new “Il Duce” rules play out, but this particular one does not allow for “third-party demands/control” in any way shape or form.
Now I just need to figure out how to unlink this one, and use the HT blog as the main login… LOL
March 16th, 2009 at 11:48 am
I want to ask how the “exchange for cash” will work.I mean will there be some limitation for credits to exchange or something like that.
Thankz
March 16th, 2009 at 12:53 pm
I’m still thinking about the penalty credit fee for declining a paid advertisers, if anything, do you have any plans of increasing the drop quota from 300 to 500.since you mentioned that the fine fee might be around 50-100, so if we decline 3 ads for 100/ads reject,then what’s gonna happen is we earned 300 credits just to pay fine and none left for us to buy adverts bec we have to spend all our credits for declining the ads.
March 16th, 2009 at 1:11 pm
[...] Entrecard is Making Changes They’ve changed a few things since their last post: Entrecard Blog Blog Archive “Above the Fold” rule officialy changed to “One Page-d… __________________ *Sadie* – Sadie’s Skinny and Sadie’s Say-So Follow me on Twitter SadiesSkinny [...]
March 16th, 2009 at 1:11 pm
Am I seriously the only person who hates clicking down 47 times to quest after the EntreCard spot of someone who so kindly clicked on me but not-so-kindly hides the thing? That’s one step shy of not actually having a return-click widget at all. I know you want eyes on your blog, but mine go away after a few games of hunt-the-widget unless I truly adore your content.
Near the top. Please. At least, no further down than the length of your latest post, or two if you are laconic.
March 16th, 2009 at 1:26 pm
In reference to the “page down” requirement, in addition to screen resolution there also seem to be some differences between Firefox and IE 6 and 7. How do we nail this down?
March 16th, 2009 at 1:27 pm
Have Mercy ! Let the Truth Be TOLD.
Otilus is Talkin but apparently All Of You Missed it.
otilius (My other comments) Says:
March 16th, 2009 at 9:13 am
Ad placement has NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with bounce rate. Bounce rate is not limited to “Drop & Run” traffic. A viewer who reads your entire main page but doesn’t click to any of your other pages adds to your bounce rate, too. This is why blogs have higher bounce rates.
If you are going to discuss bounce rate from a position of authority, PLEASE do not print misinformation.
March 16th, 2009 at 2:14 pm
I thinking of this as a way to make real money while get my credits. But, what will the buy back rate be? Is there a limit?
I’m sure a few people might just want to cash out. So how will you separate the people that see this as a new income source and those that just want to go.
I know the drop and run would feed this idea to make money. What if you paid 2 or 3 credits per site. NOT per click, but per page. Allowing each visitor to get a credit for the next two pages they hit. Would this not reduce the bounce rate?
what every that case I think your going a great job… An I know you need to hear that from only me… Now you can go about your day with out worry.
March 16th, 2009 at 3:10 pm
I’m glad you changed it to one page down, I was thinking of dropping out of EC, now I get to stay. Yeah
March 16th, 2009 at 3:14 pm
This will be a little bit long, so I apologize, but I have quite a bit to say.
Let me say this before I get started. I have nothing against the new system. The widgets on my blogs have been above the fold and near the top from day one because I’m in this for the community.
“AGREED… the position will have nothing to do with the bounce rate. I place my widget near the bottom of the page for the very reason that placing it at the top makes “hit and run” dropping easy and fast.
At least if they have to scroll to the bottom, they might see something in the blog content that catches their eye.”
I would agree in some cases, and disagree in others. If your blog has content I’m interested in, I read it. If it doesn’t, then I won’t. I try to drop on a wide variety of other sites to get my name out there, but I don’t expect them to read my site if they aren’t interested. The same would apply to regular readers who aren’t members of Entrecard. Instead of “drop and run,” it would be “realize this blog doesn’t have anything for me and hit the back button.” The scenario is different, however, the end result is the same. In other cases, I disagree. I hate blogs where the author has it set up to display a ton of their recent posts, and then residing at the bottom is their EC. The intent is clear. It takes a minute to load all of the posts before the EC even appears. Not only is this bad blog design (because it means long loading times even for readers) but it is also bad for me as an Entrecarder. When I see this, I don’t think “drop and then see what this blogger has to say.” Instead, I think “I just spent all of the time I could be reading your blog waiting for everything to load.” What I mean by this is that your bounce rate may decrease, but it is ARTIFICIALLY decreased. It might look good in writing because people have to scroll through your content to get to your widget, but many will still go straight for the widget. THEY WILL have spent more time on your site, but not for what you want them to. And I’ll tell you that statistics mean nothing to me. I’m not in this for the number of readers or the rank of my blog. I’m in this for MY READERS. That is why I put my widget at the top: it allows my readers to find content that interests them, and it helps the blogs of this community.
“Ad placement has NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with bounce rate. Bounce rate is not limited to “Drop & Run” traffic. A viewer who reads your entire main page but doesn’t click to any of your other pages adds to your bounce rate, too. This is why blogs have higher bounce rates.
If you are going to discuss bounce rate from a position of authority, PLEASE do not print misinformation.”
This is the one thing I think everyone is missing: people who really do care to read the content of a blog aren’t that likely to click on the links anyways. I believe this will be especially true of the advertisements Entrecard will be placing on the widgets.
I am excited by the opportunity to earn money in the future with Entrecard. I haven’t spent a single EC since signing up here, but not because I saw this coming.
On the other hand, I completely understand the complaints. Users should inherently have control of THEIR OWN BLOG and I believe that Entrecard should respect this. The “if you don’t like it then kindly leave” approach may be beneficial for Entrecard in the short run (as far as the having a sustainable business pespective is concerned), but there is danger in the long run: quality blogs will be turned off with Entrecard’s attitude. In the end, you may find yourself with blogs that just barely make the quality guidelines. You may find yourself with people who do not care about blogging at all, but instead with making money using the system. And when you try to fix the system they may all tell you they can make more money elsewhere anyways and leave. I don’t want to see Entrecard in this situation.
I would propose (and I’m sure that it has been suggested before by at least one of the technically-minded ECers) that there be two separate widgets: one for advertisers that must be toward the top of the page, and another standard widget for blogs. The advertising widget can say “advertise here” while the standard widget can say “drop.” At least this way, people can put their EC widget anywhere they want. If people really cared about how effective their advertising campaigning was, they would look at the blog and see if it is a good fit. While this might be cracked up as “good for everybody,” there are already blogs like this, and people already have the option of advertising on these blogs. The ONLY thing the new system will do is seemingly force bloggers to comply if they don’t want to loose countless hours of hard work. A two-widget system would solve this all, and probably not be that hard to implement unless the current coding would make it prohibitively hard to change. I understand that in order to do this before the new system goes up you would have to postpone the change. I don’t suggest you do this. Instead, I would suggest that the new system go into place with the promise that this system will be implemented in the near future. This system would also be better for all bloggers. Advertisers and bloggers would both get 100% of the advertising time. Another option yet would be to let the blogger choose between the two schemes.
I just feel that possible ways of addressing bloggers’ concerns are being overlooked in favor of getting this system up as soon as possible. However, a statement that changes would be made to address these concerns after the change would help to keep quality blogs here with Entrecard. I just hope that whatever you should choose to do strengthens the community and doesn’t destroy it. We have seen too many sites suffer simply because of their effort to make major change for what they feel is better while the changes did nothing good for the users. I don’t want Entrecard to be one of these sites, and I’m willing to try my part in ensuring that this does not happen.
Thank you for your time.
March 16th, 2009 at 3:31 pm
I agree with everyone else. This adds nothing to the conversation. You NEED to say the screen resolution before anyone can make any changes.
March 16th, 2009 at 3:31 pm
I have moved it way up there now, but is it too close to my header?
March 16th, 2009 at 3:46 pm
Post has been updated. I went into our analytics to see the maximum screen resolution out of all Entrecard users, and set that to the standard so not one single member has to worry if they are in compliance. Here is the update, also posted at the top of the post:
**UPDATE**
The one page-down rule will apply to screen resolutions of 1920×1200. This is the maximum screen resolution out of all Entrecard members, so there will be no one in the system who cannot place the widget within one page-down of their own personal screen and still be in violation.
Again, what this means is that no matter what your screen resolution is, you can place the widget within one page-down of your computer screen and be in compliance.
March 16th, 2009 at 3:56 pm
Bye..
March 16th, 2009 at 4:42 pm
Geesh!
I always thought EntreCard was like a bookstore: people could browse around and if they liked something, they would “drop” by and let the blogger know. If they didn’t like the content in a web site/blog, then they could either “drop and run” or simply ignore the site.
I guess now, if you want to join EntreCard, you’ve got to accept THEIR ads – if you do not agree, you can either pay a penalty for not agreeing to the ads or you can go elsewhere.
I wish I could laugh about this fuss like Bad Gals Radio, but I do not have 80,000 visitors to my site every day. 200 drops from EntreCard a day would be AWESOME!!
But nobody has ever advertised on my blog (other than the ones that I choose to be on the EC widget) and nobody is gonna advertise on my blog AND make money – unless I get some of it.
And finally, the resolution rule .. why don’t we all just rename our blogs, “EntreCard Blog”? Advertisers would like that.
Simple.
March 16th, 2009 at 4:54 pm
I honestly don’t get the fuss about this issue…. even most of the blogs that I visit that aren’t top of the fold are pretty easy to get to … on a few GOOD blogs, I even go back so often that I remember to hit the END button to get to them
having the widget near the post you want me to read is the ONLY way to get me to read your articles… I read what’s near the widget – and if that happens to be way old stuff, I glance and don’t bother
any word on today.com blogs? I’m afraid to go look for an update in our forums
March 16th, 2009 at 4:54 pm
thanks Graham for clarifying the resolution on the one scroll down rull. seems like a good way to handle it. seems fair. also hope this is marketable to any potential ad clients when you try to sell the ads.
March 16th, 2009 at 5:26 pm
I look forward to the above the fold rule because I was really getting tired of hunting for the widget on some blogs. My widget was always above the fold, so I have nothing to worry about.
Looking forward to seeing how the other changes work out.
March 16th, 2009 at 5:34 pm
The new rule is better.Thanks…
March 16th, 2009 at 6:32 pm
Will there also be a post addressing clearly the concerns regarding having to pay a fee for rejecting ads, as if we didn’t own our blogs? This issue is not a secondary one. It is actually the main reason for many bloggers getting ready to leave.
March 16th, 2009 at 7:00 pm
Thank you for listening and reacting sensibly to the concerns of many bloggers over the fold issue.
It’s only sensible that people give the new system a try, but I wish Entrecard would stop using terminology like bloggers being “in violation” or being “in compliance”. The blogs are OURS, not Entrecard’s.
March 16th, 2009 at 10:04 pm
I’d like to know how it is oh so more for the better to have our widgets closer to the top of the blog page versus the bottom?
Someone here in the earlier comments had commented that at least if it is toward the middle to the bottom of the page, people will have to scroll down to look for it, and in turn might find something worth while to read while scrolling. I agree with this thought process because I tend to do this.
If I go back a blog that dropped on me, and return the favor, if the widget is at the top of the page, I tend to just drop and go onto the next blog. If I have to scroll, I tend to read what they have on their blogs.
I still don’t like being told where my widget needs to be placed. However, I am willing to try and see if it does boost my drops. I will work on it this weekend with my theme.
March 16th, 2009 at 11:28 pm
this was very much required… but i feel it should be left on the blog owner where he wants to have the widget…. coz sometimes..blog design doesn’t allow us to put this widget on top as there are many other ‘more important’ things…
anyways i am curious to know how many ECs are there in rotation…if you dont mind….
March 17th, 2009 at 7:49 am
Thank you here again for listening to all of us and having what it takes to make the changes that so many of us were concerned about.
March 17th, 2009 at 7:50 am
thanks – I did not know this and mine is at the top of my page. Heading off to fix tis now.
March 17th, 2009 at 8:01 am
I appreciate you taking the time to listen to the concerns listed above and for being so responsive. Entrecard is a marvelous concept that I am thoroughly enjoying. Would you consider taking a look at my site? Due to the configuration of the blog, I am not certain the Ecard can be placed elsewhere and I would very much like to continue participation.
March 17th, 2009 at 11:10 am
OMG the above the fold and the credit charge ideas were the final straw. At least common sense has prevailed there. Still there are problems… if we are going to be flooded with 3rd party ads I do hope we are given credits as compensation otherwise you will find a lot of people removing them. Essentially if your blog widget is valued at 256 or 512 or 768 credits (for example) it should bump up the price of your widget to the next level. If not I do not see the advantage of giving away advertising space? Essentially as far as the EC community goes the advertising will remove clicks from the system rather than bring in more. The only reason EC succeeds is down to the faithful clickers out there, I click 600 blogs almost everyday, if half my efforts go to someone with lots of cash and no stamina I will probably call it a day – let’s see if common sense will prevail once more. Can anyone out there program php? We need a whizz kid who can make an alternative to EC with an open credits market rather than a cash system. You will be losing all the Today blogs for a start, I doubt they will be the only ones to go.
March 17th, 2009 at 11:36 am
I was going to write a long comment ranting about this new change EC was about to make until I read Paul Baines.I believe he pretty much covered it all.I’m willing to see it all in action and how it pans out but if I’m not satisfied I’m heading for the hills.Some one is bound to create a better format once the vacuum gets turned on.All those dust particles have to land some where.Just a thought.
March 17th, 2009 at 6:10 pm
I could only have the EC widget place in a certain area of the page due to the layout. For the moment, I have place it under the resources section. I could place it higher up, if I get some feedback and informative instructions from Entrecard.
March 19th, 2009 at 7:49 am
I think the fact that you have changed the above the fold rule is a good idea. Hopefully it will actually help with the bounce rates.
March 19th, 2009 at 3:58 pm
I just have to say that dropping has been so much faster and easier that I DO have time to read more of the blogs I like, and have even discovered a few more that I can stop and read more thoroughly since more people have put that widget up high. Looks like a win – win situation to me thus far!
March 20th, 2009 at 8:01 am
I saw this post on my dashboard but I honestly don’t think the issue has been properly publicised. I think we need to take the effort ot make sure everyone knows about this before we have to take more effort asking people to clean it up.
March 20th, 2009 at 10:36 am
I think this is a good change because I’ve been to blogs that don’t have a widget at all, but are advertising. I’ve been to some where you have to search for the widget even with the above the fold rule. So, I’m not sure what all the fuss is about with the change, but I do hope this works for everyone.
March 20th, 2009 at 12:18 pm
Thank you again for listing haven’t made a EC since I signed up but I guess I should have seen it coming. I am excited about the opportunity to earn money in the future with entrecard. to all of us and again thank you for caring.
Helen Yelverton
March 21st, 2009 at 12:51 pm
EntreCard is definitely improving…I never heard of a program that exchanges surfing credits for cash….
I wonder what all the “nay-sayers” I’ve been running into have to say NOW?!
March 23rd, 2009 at 11:51 am
As one of the previous comments said:
“I think this is a good change because I’ve been to blogs that don’t have a widget at all, but are advertising. I’ve been to some where you have to search for the widget even with the above the fold rule.”
I’ve moved mine on top of the page
and it really helps, I have more people click and drop
April 17th, 2009 at 1:31 pm
This was the most ridiculous rule ever. It completely neglects a basic knowledge of media buying and is based on “chain drop” system that ought be considered a throw back to this service’s beginnings.
It also completely neglects the obvious:
• Quality sites will always benefit advertisers with more traffic than inferior sites.
• Less ad competitive sites will always benefit advertisers more than ad heavy sites.
• Load time is much more signifiant than where an advertisement is placed.
Ergo, ad position means absolutely nothing on a site. On the other hand, this rule means a lot for the direction of this service.
All my best,
Rich